Big congratulations ManUnderMask, you have been awarded the GB's and the belt!!!
| MMA-Torrents.com Forum https://foru.mma-torrents.com/ |
|
| [SPOILERS] UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping [COMPETITION.RESULTS] https://foru.mma-torrents.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=5287 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | SyMBi0TiK [ Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | [SPOILERS] UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping [COMPETITION.RESULTS] |
Ladies and gentlemen, it's time to present the results of the UFC ON FX 7: BELFORT vs. BISPING competition! UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping Saturday, January 19th, 2013 Ibirapuera Arena São Paulo, Brazil The fight winners are in RED: Competition Prizes: * 11 correct picks = 30 GB + 1 Invite * 10 correct picks = 20 GB * 9 correct picks = 10 GB League Points: Every correct pick made by each user is equal to 1 point. The points are automatically added to the competition league table here: Results: Unfortunately nobody scored a perfect 11/11 or even 10/11... But CONGRATULATIONS to our lone WINNER who picked 9/11... You will receive the UFC ON FX 7: BELFORT vs. BISPING belt and 10 GB's! ManUnderMask GOOD WORK EVERYONE ELSE!!! UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping ManUnderMask (correct: 9, incorrect: 2) DivMuzza (correct: 8, incorrect: 3) gasto123 (correct: 8, incorrect: 3) BEAR (correct: 8, incorrect: 3) jrhendrix (correct: 8, incorrect: 3) josh69 (correct: 8, incorrect: 3) MrDabolina (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) kenoh (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) ObSkewer (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) slight (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) mrshazam (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) tacco (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) unknown (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) xbm (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) instruction (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) javiermma (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) scruff90 (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) flop12 (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) ChinMusic (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) Gonz (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) makaveli1 (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) Twon (correct: 7, incorrect: 4) caspa05 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Gurman2000 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) jab987 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) jab123 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) rcduthie77 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) jonyv (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) snipaks (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) 5ean2ay (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) two7sclash (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) PKaos (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) mario1992 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) shingo88 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Obdurate (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Eddiethekid (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Fodaum (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) genveers (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) astate81 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) oldpal (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) LRF (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) originaldude (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) fromthedust (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) dolcca (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) eperim (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) james575 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) tluper92 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) onlymemike (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) tech4mac (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) 3X (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Mushulive (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) jayjaypeekay (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) brutkd (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Mushuggah (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) jnrpepaseed (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) SyMBi0TiK (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Angst01 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) weech (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) jumanjoo (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Bangtail (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) bink (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) tommybutters (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) kdubbinn (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) Dro40 (correct: 6, incorrect: 5) hsu9540 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) feli2 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) what1985 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) mayihavethis (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) varunjosh (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Pika (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Snoop (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) clasonic13 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) malafala (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Luniz (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Burdock (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) revilo (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) didzis (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) dexbot (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) kyodemon24 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) jitsuka (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) redcharade (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Goatboy (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) kieran45 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Maron (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) mattt (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) pekerman (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) fibonacci (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) hector7611 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) sebmorrison (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) PUNXN0TD34D (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) kopsikiller (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Holden (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) Lecake (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) gaul (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) bojo1980 (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) xavve (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) IamStuUngar (correct: 5, incorrect: 6) MRbloom (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) Pelledead (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) Asilva (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) reddleman (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) hendo (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) poincy (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) gman7 (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) Rebelliondog (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) freddek (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) rstandley (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) z4pk (correct: 4, incorrect: 7) motafinga (correct: 3, incorrect: 8) rocko8181 (correct: 3, incorrect: 8) Jaemie (correct: 3, incorrect: 8) gaving7095 (correct: 3, incorrect: 8) lenoz (correct: 3, incorrect: 8) tysonman (correct: 3, incorrect: 8) feichar64 (correct: 3, incorrect: 8) TheSnowman (correct: 2, incorrect: 9) |
|
| Author: | MrDabolina [ Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: [SPOILERS] UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping [COMPETITION.RESULTS] |
I hate that I missed the other 2 events.... but I'll take the high showing here. |
|
| Author: | Dent [ Mon Jan 21, 2013 12:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: [SPOILERS] UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping [COMPETITION.RESULTS] |
Big congratulations ManUnderMask, you have been awarded the GB's and the belt!!!
|
|
| Author: | dolcca [ Mon Jan 21, 2013 5:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: [SPOILERS] UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping [COMPETITION.RESULTS] |
oh nooo!! bisping lost the fight fok!!! so who will face anderson silva??? maybe okami?? |
|
| Author: | Bangtail [ Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: [SPOILERS] UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping [COMPETITION.RESULTS] |
I think there are a fair amount of choices on the next fight for the spider. The winner of a match up between Belfort vs either Rockhold, Lombard or Weidman and the winner would get a title shot. If Belfort wins he would definitely deserve another shot at the title. Rashad could even move down a weight class and have a stab at it. |
|
| Author: | dolcca [ Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: [SPOILERS] UFC on FX 7: Belfort vs. Bisping [COMPETITION.RESULTS] |
i m sorry but Rockhold is overrated!! he should fight Okami first to see if he's number one contender or not. plus, weidman should better fight one more fight than getting directly the title shot. i dont know why evans doesn't want to drop to 185...he can make it right? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|