| MMA-Torrents.com Forum https://foru.mma-torrents.com/ |
|
| Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 [SPOILER FREE RATING] https://foru.mma-torrents.com/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=1508 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | subvertbeats [ Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 [SPOILER FREE RATING] |
Vote and post your spoiler free rating for Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 |
|
| Author: | Naeblis [ Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 [SPOILER FREE RATING] |
Fights were okay, if occasionally not that competitive. Promotionally, though, I thought this was really poor for a Strikeforce event - lack of knowledge on the rules, renaming of the women's weight divisions, commentators complaining about the lack of fireworks/knockouts/risk-taking, patchy matchmaking, dry ice from the smoke machines so much that it was in the cage for a while during a couple of early fights, and loads of blatant advertising for Showtime during commentary and introductions. Worth a download and a watch, but not a classic event for sure. |
|
| Author: | Dent [ Sun Feb 28, 2010 11:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 [SPOILER FREE RATING] |
I enjoyed the even even though it felt a little long and dragged out for a "challenger" event. Surprisingly the camerwork was better then their last big event, but Im no expert on that so.. I enjoyed some of the fights a lot and I defenitely think that you should watch the event, if not for anything else to see what fighters look like future contenders. |
|
| Author: | subvertbeats [ Tue Mar 02, 2010 8:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 [SPOILER FREE RATING] |
| Author: | BVandDietPepsi [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 5:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 [SPOILER FREE RATING] |
I went with a 3. In reality, it could have been a 2 or 4 easily. The refs on this card were astoundingly bad. Almost insultingly bad. The fights weren't nearly as good as the last Challengers card, but I'm a mark for title fights, so Kaufman-Hashi entertained me. If we're going spoiler-free, two fighters in particular really impressed me and shouldn't be on Challenger cards anymore. I would have given last Challengers a 4, so this one is a comfortable 3. |
|
| Author: | Dragonfoxy [ Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Strikeforce Challengers: Feb 26 2010 [SPOILER FREE RATING] |
Not good but not bad. As a newcomer I need to say that after seeing a few SF events now that I have no idea what their format is. Last time they had a nice feature with stats, now they didn't as example. Guess being a challengers tournament you can compare it to TUF fights apart from the finals, so in that case it is ok to watch but not the matches you would buy a ticket for. Then again it remains a fighting event that has fighters wanting to prove themselves and a few did show they have potential. And one thing we can't blame SF for, they do not own the referees or select them so I think it is not fair to blame them for bad referees. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|